تحقیقات تاریخ اقتصادی ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار تاریخ گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد تاریخ، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

رقابت­های شدید اقتصادی ایران و عثمانی در دوره صفوی از جمله مباحثی است که مناسبات دو سرزمین را تحت شعاع قرار داد؛ به طوری که حاکمان دو سرزمین به طور پیوسته و گسترده از سیاست­های اقتصادی به عنوان اهرم فشار بر یکدیگر استفاده می‌کردند. یکی از سیاست­های اقتصادی که نقش مهمی در مناسبات سیاسی و اقتصادی حکومت صفوی و عثمانی داشت، تحریم تجارت ابریشم بود. در این دوره ابریشم به عنوان یکی از مهم­ترین کالاهای درآمدزا، همواره در تجارت داخلی و خارجی حکومت­های صفویه و عثمانی نقش اساسی داشت. بر این اساس، پژوهش پیش­رو با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی درصدد است به بررسی نقش تجارت ابریشم در مناسبات دولت صفوی و عثمانی بپردازد. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که دولت­های صفوی و عثمانی در تلاش بودند با استفاده از کارکردهای مختلف ابریشم و محروم کردن دشمن از منابع درآمدی آن، دولت مقابل را با فشار و محدودیت­هایی به تغییر در رفتارهای سیاست خارجی و تسلیم شدن در مقابل خواسته­های خود وادار کنند. از آنجایی که صنعت ابریشم مهم­ترین تولیدات دو کشور بود و یکی از مهم­ترین منابع درآمدزا در این دوره به شمار می­رفت، تحت تأثیر این سیاست­ها، از جهت تولید و فروش تحت تأثیر منفی قرار گرفت؛ به طوری که موانع غیرتعرفه­ای در تجارت خارجی، روابط اقتصادی ایران و عثمانی را که از تجارت ابریشم نشأت می­گرفت، تضعیف کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Extended Abstract

 The role of silk trade in Iran-Ottoman relations during the Safavid period

 Introduction

The formation of the Safavid government along with the officialization of the Shia religion in Iran brought the country's relations with the Ottoman government into new dimensions. If during this period, the governments tried to control the roads, commercial ports and economic centers and in this field they went to the limit of war and bloodshed. It was administered locally. Each of the princes and princes, in a corner of this country, claimed independent government in different ways. The founder of the Safavid dynasty in a short period of time eliminated all the rivals and formed a powerful central government, which was very expensive for the Ottoman government, especially since the supporters of the Safavids immigrated to Iran in a group and continuously from Asia Minor. They became a source of worry for the Ottomans. Therefore, the establishment of Safavid rule in 907 A.H., in addition to political and religious conflicts, created intense economic competition between Iran and the Ottoman Empire. So that in the 10th and 11th centuries of the lunar calendar, the rulers of the two countries continuously and extensively used economic issues as a lever of pressure on each other, which brought unfortunate consequences for the residents of the two countries. Among the economic policies that these countries used to advance their foreign policy goals, we can mention the issue of silk trade and how to export it.

In addition, the development of the Ottoman Empire had doubled its geopolitical role in Iran's trade relations, and Iran was deprived of direct communication with Europe, and Iranian and European merchants faced serious problems in commuting. Therefore, in this period, as in the previous periods, there was a significant export of raw silk to the Ottoman Empire, and a large amount of Iranian muskets were imported from the Ottoman territory. However, the great successes of the Ottoman Empire, which coincided with the rise of the Safavid government, had negative effects on the Safavid economy. In order to compensate for these disadvantages, they tried to adopt opposite policies in order to reduce the economic pressures of the Ottoman government to some extent. Based on this, the current research tries to investigate the role of silk trade in the political relations between the Safavid government and the Ottoman Empire by using historical sources and the researches of Turkish historians and to answer the main question of what effect silk has on the political relations of the government. Had Safavid and Ottoman? And what was the reason and motivation for using silk as an economic tool by the mentioned governments?

Methodology: The research method used in this research, in addition to descriptive methods, in some parts of the research, quantitative methods and interpretation methods were also used. In fact, in the current research, an attempt has been made to achieve a significant result in the field of research with the combined method or link between quality and quantity of historical data.

Findings: The results of the research indicate that the Safavid and Ottoman governments were trying to use different functions of silk and depriving the enemy of its sources of income, forcing the opposite government to change its foreign policy behavior and surrender to force against their wishes. Since the silk industry was the most important production of the two countries and was considered one of the most important sources of income in this period, under the influence of these policies, it was negatively affected in terms of production and sales; So that the non-tariff barriers in foreign trade weakened the economic relations between Iran and the Ottoman Empire, which originated from the silk trade.

Discussion and conclusion: During the Safavid period, silk, as one of the most important export and income-generating goods, played an important role in the commercial exchanges between the two Ottoman and Safavid governments. In this period, this product played an essential role as a commercial product in the political and economic relations of the Safavids and the Ottomans, and in a way formed the main pillar of the economy of the two governments. In addition, the expansion of the Ottoman Empire and its dominance over the economic highways caused them to monitor Iran's trade with European countries. During this period, the Ottoman government dominated a large part of the regions and received huge revenues from the passage of merchants. Another point is that during this period, the main stream of gold and silver ornaments entered Iran through the silk trade, and most of it came from the territory of the Ottoman Empire. Based on this, the Ottoman government, due to political-military and religious differences with Iran, always used economic policies such as banning the departure of gold and silver ornaments from its territory, confiscating the property of merchants, and banning the purchase and sale of Iranian silk on the economy. The Safavid government was striking. In contrast, the Safavid government took the following measures to counter the pressures of the Ottoman government: a) monopolizing the sale of silk; b) Paying attention to the increase of silk exports by Armenian merchants; c) Changing the traditional trade route to the north and south of Iran. Therefore, it can be said that since silk was the most important production of the two countries, it was influenced by the policies of the Safavid and Ottoman rulers; So that the decrease in the volume of silk trade led to a decrease in Ottoman tax revenues and the closing of industrial centers, and in contrast to the lack of silk sales and the lack of gold and silver musukkas from the sale of silk, it had many negative economic and political consequences for the Safavid government. The result affected both countries in a negative direction. Also, due to the fact that the pulsating economic pulse and financial income were aimed at each other, these financial policies usually became one of the factors in the formation of conflicts over the interests between the two Ottoman and Safavid governments, which were harmful to both governments. It caused a lot of financial and human losses. In addition, the Ottoman government tried to gain a strategic advantage against Iran by sanctioning the Safavid government's sources of income; But this case had the opposite result, so that the stoppage of the import of muskets from the Ottoman territory and their financial policies against the Safavid government led to the expansion of Iran's political and economic relations with the western governments and, as a result, the increase in the entry of gold and silver muskets into the country. And in contrast to the formation of tense political and economic relations between Iran and the Ottoman Empire, it stopped the import of silk to the Ottoman Empire as a basic commercial commodity from Iran, which increased the domestic silk production of the Ottoman government and reduced the export of muskrats from this country.

Offers:

- Dealing with the effects of silk trade in the political and military developments of the Safavid government

- Dealing with the role of the Safavid government in the relations with the western governments to expand the silk trade

- Dealing with the role of silk producing cities in the silk trade during the Safavid period

اسناد پادریان کرملی،(1383)، بازمانده از سده شاه عباس صفوی، به کوشش منوچهر ستوده با همکاری ایرج افشار، تهران، نشر میراث مکتوب.
اولئاریوس، آدام،(1363)، سفرنامۀ مسکو و ایران، ترجمۀ احمد بهپور، تهران، ابتکار.
اینالجق، خلیل،(1388)، تاریخ امپراتوری عثمانی، دوره­ی متقدم، ترجمه کیومرث قرقلو، تهران، بصیرت.
باستانی پاریزی، محمد ابراهیم،(1378)، سیاست و اقتصاد سده صفوی، تهران، انتشارات صفی علیشاه.
پارسادوست، منوچهر،(1377)، روابط دیپلماسی شاه عباس اول با اسپانیا و پرتغال، تهران، بی نا.
پاشازاده، محمد عارف،(1378)، انقلاب الاسلام بین الخواص و العوام، قم، دلیل ما.
پورگشتال، هامر،(1367)، تاریخ امپراتوری عثمانی، ترجمه میرزا زکی علی آبادی، ج3، تهران، زرین.
تاجبخش، احمد،(1378)، تاریخ صفویه، شیراز، نوید.
تاورنیه، ژان باپتیست، (1336)، سفرنامۀ تاورنیه، ترجمۀ ابوتراب نوری، به تصحیح شیروانی، چاپ دوم، تهران، سنایی.
ترکمان، اسکندر بیگ،(1350)، تاریخ عالم آرای عباسی، به کوشش ایرج افشار، چاپ دوم، انتشارات امیر کبیر، تهران.
حقی اوزون چارشلی، اسماعیل،(1380)، تاریخ عثمانی، ترجمه وهاب ولی، ج2، تهران، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
خواجگی اصفهانی، محمد معصوم،(1368)، خلاصة السیر (تاریخ روزگار شاه صفی)، تهران، علمی.
درهوهانیان، هاروتون،(1379)، تاریخ جلفای اصفهان، ترجمه لئون میناسیان و م.ع موسوی فریدونی، اصفهان، نشر زنده رود.
دلاواله، پیترو،(1348)، سفرنامه، ترجمۀ شجاع الدین شفا، تهران، بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
رومه، اچ. آ،(1378)، تاریخ تیموریان به روایت کمبریج، ترجمه یعقوب آژند، تهران، جامی.
سانسون، مارتین،(1346)، وضع کشور شاهنشاهی ایران در زمان شاه سلیمان صفوی (سفرنامۀ سانسون)، ترجمۀ تقی تفضلی، تهران، ابن سینا.
سفرنامه­های ونیزیان در ایران،(1381)، ترجمه منوچهر امیری، چاپ دوم، تهران، خوارزمی.
سلطانیان، ابوطالب،(1390)، کارکرد ابریشم و نقش بازرگانان ارمنی در اقتصاد و سیاست صفویان، پژوهشنامه تاریخ تمدن اسلامی، دوره 44، ش 2، پاییز و زمستان، ص 79- 101.
سیبلا شوستر، والسر،(1364)، ایران صفوی از دیدگاه سفرنامه­های اروپائیان، ترجمه و حواشی غلامرضا ورهرام، تهران، امیر کبیر.
شاردن، ژان،(1350)، سیاحت نامۀ شاردن، ترجمۀ محمد عباسی، ج4، تهران، امیرکبیر.
شعبانی، رضا، منیره، کاظمی راشد،( 1389)، «نقش گذرگاهی تبریز در تجارت ابریشم ایران و آناتولی از دوره ترکمانان تا آغاز سده شاه عباس اول صفوی»، فصلنامه مسکویه، سال 5، ش 14، پاییز، ص 114- 11.
صفاکیش، حمیدرضا، (1390)، صفویان در گذرگاه تاریخ، تهران، نشر سخن.
طاهری، ابوالقاسم،(1349)، تاریخ سیاسی- اجتماعی ایران، تهران، کتابهای جیبی.
غوگاسیان، وازگن،(1393)، تاریخ ارامنه ایران در قرن هفدهم میلادی، تهران، امیرکبیر.
فلسفی، نصرالله،(1342)، سیاست خارجی ایران در دوره صفویه، تهران، کتابهای جیبی.
فلسفی، نصرالله،(1371)، زندگانی شاه عباس اول، ج5، تهران، انتشارات علمی.
فلور، ویلم،(1356)، اولین سفرای ایران و هلند، به کوشش داریوش مجلسی و حسین ابوترابیان، تهران، طهوری.
فیگوئروا، دون گارسیا دوسیلوا،(1363) سفرنامه، ترجمه غلامرضا سمیعی، تهران، نشر نو.
کارری، جملی،(1354)، سفرنامه کارری، ترجمه محمد صادق همایونفر، تهران، کتابخانه ملی ایران.
لازاریان، ژانت د،(1388)، دانشنامه ایرانیان ارمنی، تهران، هیرمند.
متی، رودلف،(1387)، اقتصاد و سیاست خارجی ایران سده صفوی، ترجمه حسن زندیه، قم، پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
منجم یزدی، ملاجلال،(1366)، تاریخ عباسی یا روزنامه ملاجلال، به کوشش سیف الله وحیدنیا، تهران، نشر وحید.
مهدوی، عبدالرضا هوشنگ،(1350)، تاریخ روابط خارجی ایران، تهران، امیرکبیر.
نوایی، عبدالحسین،(1367)، شاه عباس اول (مجموعه اسناد و مکاتبات تاریخی همراه با یاداشتهای تفصیلی)، ج3، تهران، زرین.
Afşih, Şahin, Sibel, Cengiz, (2010), 16'ncı Yüzyıl Fiyat Devrimi Ve Osmanlı-İran Savaşlarının Osmanlı Ipekçilik Endüstrisi Üzerine Etkileri, Işletme Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi.
Akdağ, M. (1995), Türkiye’nin Içtimai Ve Iktisadi Tarihi 2(1453-1559) Cilt II, Istanbul, Cem Yayınevi.
Alkan, Nilüfer, (2005), Bursa'da Ipek Üretim Ve Ticaretinin Doğu Ülkeleri Ile Olan Ilişkisi (15-16. Yy'lar), Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.
Aydoğmuşoğlu, Cihat,(2012), Şah Abbas Devrinde(1587-1629) Iran'da Ticarî Hayat, A.Ü, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi.
Babaie, S, Babayan, K, Ina Baghdiantz, M, Farhad, M, (2004), The Slaves Of The Shah New Elites Of Safavid Iran, London: Tairus.
Canan Kuş, Büyüktaş,(2020), Safevi Hükümdarı Şah I. Abbasın Osmanlı Devleti'nin Hindistan Ticareti'ndeki Rolünü Engelleme Faaliyetleri.
Dalsar, Fahri, (1960), Barsa Da Ipek Cilik, Sermet Mat Baasi, S Msettin Arkadas, Istanbul.
Dalsar, Fahri, (1960), Türk Sanayi Ve Ticaret Tarihinde Bursa'da Ipekçilik, Sermet Matbaası, Istanbul Üniversitesi Iktisat Fakültesi.
Dede, Zeynep,(2019), XVI, Yüzyılın Ilk Çeyreğinde Osmanlı Devleti Tarafından Safevilere Karşı Alınan Bir Tedbir, Ibrişim Yasağı, Studies Of The Ottoman Doman, Sayi 16, Şubat.
Dedeyev, B. (2009), Caldıran Savası’na Kadar Osmanlı-Safevi Iliskilerine Kısa Bir Bakıs. Uluslar Arası Sosyal Arastırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2/6, Kıs.
Dumans, P. Raphael,(1980), Estat De La Perse En 1660, Publié Par Ch. Schefer, Paris, Ernest Leroux.
Faroghi, S.( 2008), Osmanlı Dünyasında Üretmek, Pazarlamak, Yaşamak; Çeviren: Gül Çağalı Güven, Özgür Türesay, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Ferrier, Ronald,(1986), “Trade From The Mid-14th Century To The End Of The Safavid Period”, Cambridge History Of Iran, London, University Press, Vol. 6.
Firrier, R.W,(1973), The Armenians And East India Company In Persia In 17 Th And Early 18 Th Century, Economic History Reviw Series Xxxvi.
Genç, M.(2007), Devlet Ve Ekonomi. İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınları.
Ina Baghdiantz, Mccabe,(1999), The Shahs Silk For Europes Silver: The Eurasina Silk Trade Of T He Julfan Aemenains (1530-1750), University Of Pennsylvania.
İnalcık, H.(1970), The Ottoman Economic Mind And Aspects Of The Ottoman Economy. In: Studies In The Economic History Of The Middle East, (Ed.) M. A. Cook, London.
İnalcık, H.(2009), Devlet-I Aliyye, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Üzerine Araştırmalar-I, Klasik Dönem(1302-1606), İstanbul, Türkiye Iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
İnalcık, Halil, (2000), Osmanlı Imparatorluğu'nun Ekonomik Ve Sosyal Tarihi, Çev: Halil Berktay, Eren Yayıncılık.
Kunt, M., Faroghi, S. & Yuraydın, H.G. (2008), Türkiye Tarihi 2 Osmanlı Devleti 1300-1600. İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi.
Kütükoğlu, Bekir,(1993), Osmanlı-İran Siyasi Münasebetleri(1578-1612), İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti Yayınları.
Matthee, Rudolph,(2000), Merchants In Safavid Iran: Participants And Perceptions, Journal Of Eaely Modern History, 4.
Pamuk, Sevket,(1999), A Monetary History Of The Ottoman Empire, Cambridge, Cambridg University Press.
Saray, Mehmet,(1999),Türk-İran Ilişkileri, Atatürk Araştırmaları  Merkezi.
Tabakoğlu, A. (2005), Türk Iktisat Tarihi, İstanbul, Dergah Yayınları.