Document Type : .

Author

Associate Professor / Department of History / Faculty of Humanities / Islamic Azad University,Centeral Tehran Branch/ Tehran / Iran

10.30465/sehs.2023.46008.1932

Abstract

Extended abstract
 
In this article, we examine socioeconomic matters within the context of Ilkhanid-era political literature, focusing on Vassaf Shirazi's treatise, "Tīḡ va Qalam." This work epitomizes the political debate genre of its time and necessitates a multifaceted analysis. Through the exploration of the treatise, which centers on the conflict between military forces, symbolized by the blade (Tīḡ), and bureaucratic elites, represented by the pen (Qalam), the following questions arise: How are the socioeconomic challenges, resulting from land transfers and the exchange of state responsibilities for services under a military feudalism framework, depicted within the text? Additionally, what potential resolutions are proposed to address these issues, and how are they conceptualized and portrayed within the treatise?
Based on the historical explanatory approach, our research hypothesis posits that during the final decades of the Ilkhanid era, military personnel expanded their economic roles beyond traditional military duties by receiving land and occasional provincial governance from the Ilkhan in exchange for their services through the iqta' system. The conflict between the sword and the pen, as presented by Vassaf, elucidates the deep divisions and fractures within the Ilkhanid governance under the emerging class of military landholders, as well as its influence on social crises and issues. Ultimately, this examination seeks to shed light on potential solutions that were proposed to surmount these challenges.
The death of Ghazan and the subsequent relaxation of oversight over military landholders led to the iqta policy's consolidation of the military landholding aristocracy's power. This development weakened central authority and significantly augmented the faction's influence within the Ilkhanid government. The resultant imbalance posed an escalating threat that significantly contributed to the decline and eventual collapse of Mongol rule. Moreover, it engendered social unrest, political instability, and heightened insecurity throughout Iran.
Additional research findings suggest that Vassaf's motivations for penning the treatise "The Sword and the Pen" were multi-faceted. Key objectives included reducing the threat posed by the increasingly powerful Mongol military aristocracy and their decentralizing inclinations, bolstering the theory of Iranian-style kingship, and advocating for centralized governance under the sovereign's authority. By curtailing the dominance of the decentralized Mongol military aristocracy, Vassaf sought to mitigate social harm and maintain the cohesion of the Ilkhanid state. However, these dynamics ultimately contributed to the fragmentation of the state, paving the way for the emergence of new governing entities and dynasties such as the Jalayirids, Chobanids, Togha-Teimurs, Jani-Qurbanis, and others that managed to seize power and establish control.

Keywords

refrences
Amīr Mo‘ezzī, Moḥammad (1983). Dīvān-e Aš‘ār, edited by Mohammad Reza Qanbari, Tehran, Marzabān.  [In Persian]
Bagheri Mahmoud (1975). Tārīḵ-e Šāhī, edited by Mohammad Ebrahim Bastani Parizi, Tehran, Bonyād-e Farhang-e Īrān. [In Persian]
Bagheri Mahmoud (1996). Debate and its progress in Persian literature, Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran branch. [In Persian]
Dehḵodā, ‘Alī Akbar (1955). Loḡat-nāmeh, edited by Mohammad Moin & Seyyed Jafar Shahidi, Tehran, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Falah Gh.A. (2008) The Role of Debate in Ferdowsi's Shahname, 2nd Volume, issue 1. [In Persian]
Forouzanfar, Badiozzaman (2004), Soḵan va Soḵanvarān, Tehran, ḵarazmī.  [In Persian]
Ḡazzālī, Moḥammad (2010). Naṣīḥat ul-Molūk; Corrected by Azizullah Alizadeh. Tehran, Ferdūs. [In Persian]
Ghanimi, Mohammad (1994) Comparative Literature, translated by Morteza Ayatollah Zadeh Shirazi. Tehran, Amīr Kabīr. [In Persian]
Ībn Ṭaqṭaqā, Moḥammad b. ‘Alī (1988). Tārīḵ Faḵrī, Tehran, scientific and cultural.
ḵwāǰah Naṣīr ul-Dīn Ṭūsī (1967). Aḵlāq-e Nāṣerī, edited by Adib Tehrani, Tehran, ǰāvidān. [In Persian]
Lambton, Ann Katharine swynford (2000), State and government in medival Islam, translated by Ali Morshedizad, Tehran, Tabīān.  [In Persian]
Mo‘īn, Moḥammad (2008). "Farhang-e Mo‘īn" , Farhang Nāmeh, Tehran.
Nafisi, Saeed (1363), History of Poetry and Prose in Iran and the Persian Language, Tehran, Foroūḡī. [In Persian]
Neẓāmī, Elīās (2004), "ḵamseh-e Neẓāmī", Tehran, Dostān Publishing House. [In Persian]
Nezamuddin Esfahani, Sword and pen debate, manuscript, Topqapi Sarai, No. 329. [In Persian]
Ramzjo, Hossein (1992) Literary genres and their effects in Persian language, Mashhad, Āstān-e Qods Rażavī. [In Persian]
Sa‘dī (1992). Kolīyyāt-e Sa‘dī (Golestān, Būstān, Ghazalīyāt, Qaṣāyed, Rasā’el), edited by Mohammad Ali Foroughi, Tehran, Amīr Kabīr. [In Persian]
Shoshtari, Morteza (2010). Debates in Persian Poetry and Literature, Poetry and Literature, No. 60. [In Persian]
Sotodeniya, Sediqeh; Sharifpour Enayatullah (2022), review of the debate in ḵwāǰūye Kermānī 's prose works, Baharestan Sokhan Quarterly, 19th year, no. 57. [In Persian]
Tabatabayi, Seyyed Javad (2005), An introduction to the decline of political thought, Tehran, Kavīr. [In Persian]
Vassāf al-Shīrāzī (1959). Tārīḵ-e Vassāf, edited by Mehdi Esfahani, Tehran, Rošdīyeh.  [In Persian]
Vassāf al-Shīrāzī (2006), Resāleh-e Šamšīr va Qalam, corrected by Nasrullah Pourjavadi, Tehran, Research Institute for Human Sciences. [In Persian]